AKA "Donny B" and "Mattman", AKA "SFT", Standing For Truth [sic].
Donny boy repeatedly challenged me to debate him on endogenous retroviruses. I repeatedly declined, explaining that the truth is not something to be decided by rhetorical pissing contests, and that I would prefer a written discussion. He refused, and tried to goad me into his pissing contest, calling ME the coward. Another reason I gave for declining his demands was that I had seen the atrocious ways he treated his "guests" on his channel. But eventually, with his continuous whining and jeering, I relented, and agreed that we could take turns to present our points on video, and stitch the results together to form a debate. He had said that he wanted to debate "VIGEs" with me - the creationists hypothesis that at least some ERVs had been designed into genomes in order to exogenise and re-endogenise in order to 'stir the pot' of genetic variation. He agreed to my proposal, and so I made the video I link to here. As soon as I sent it to him, he became "too busy" to respond. He has been "too busy" for a year and a half at the time of writing this. Apparently he has done this with other people when he has painted himself into a corner. He has been so busy that he has had to block me from commenting on all his internet outlets, including his Facebook page and his YouTube channel. If you know about B&B, send them a link to this.
And here is my review of Donny's
THE FIRST COUPLE: ADAM AND EVE - INDEPENDENT ORIGINS: REFUTING THE CRITICS OF BIBLICAL CREATION PART ONE
https://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B08H6NM8SP/ref=acr_dp_hist_1?ie=UTF8&filterByStar=one_star&reviewerType=all_reviews#reviews-filter-bar
And did "Team SFT" Really Debunk "Stated Clearly" on the DNA Evidence That Humans & Chimps Share A Common Ancestor: Endogenous Retroviruses?https://barryhisblog.blogspot.com/p/did-team-sft-really-debunk-stated.html
And SFT's attempts to answer my questions on the "ERVs were designed" hypothesis.
https://barryhisblog.blogspot.com/p/standing-for-truth-attempts-to-reply-to.html
No comments:
Post a Comment