Further to my contention that science is not a topic for a theist/atheist discussion group

Further to my contention that science is not a topic for a theist/atheist discussion group, here are some famous scientists who were or are believers in God.
But God appears in none of their science. The old label for science was "Natural Philosophy" - the study of nature, or the material world. Why have none of these scientists ever tried to insert God into their scientific work? Because if you believe that God is meddling with the natural world by unnatural means, you cannot trust your observations.
You may say that many of them did not "believe" in evolution (evolution is a conclusion and not a "belief", BTW), but nobody had heard a scientific account of how and why evolution happens before Darwin published "Origin".
The creationist insinuation that you cannot be a believer and accept evolution is a lie. Many believers since Darwin have managed to reconcile their beliefs with evolutionary science.
If members want to discuss evolution, there are many other Facebook groups intended to cater for that.

No comments:

Post a Comment