I asked ChatGPT,
(From https://chatgpt.com/share/69746f48-0538-8006-af6f-f56f853aafe4)
I'm looking for information on how retroviral LTRs are transcribed. It is my understanding that transcription promoters are not normally transcribed by RNA polymerase.
Great question—and you’re right to flag a subtle but important point. Retroviral LTRs are a bit of a special case that sit right at the boundary of “promoter” and “transcribed region.”
Let’s unpack it carefully.
1. What an LTR actually is
A retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) has three subregions:
U3 – R – U5
U3: contains promoter and enhancer elements
R: short sequence that is transcribed at both ends of the viral RNA
U5: downstream regulatory sequence
After integration into the host genome (provirus), you end up with:
5′ LTR (U3–R–U5) — viral genes — 3′ LTR (U3–R–U5)
2. Why it looks like a promoter is being transcribed
Your intuition is correct in general:
Promoters are binding sites for RNA polymerase, not things that get transcribed.
That is still true here—but with an important spatial detail.
The key point
RNA polymerase II initiates transcription in U3, but the transcription start site (TSS) is at the U3/R boundary.
So:
Most of U3 (the promoter/enhancer) is not transcribed
R and U5 are transcribed
The resulting RNA begins in R, not deep inside the promoter
In other words, the LTR contains a promoter, but only part of the LTR is actually transcribed.
3. How transcription works step by step
For an integrated retrovirus:
Host RNA polymerase II binds to transcription factor binding sites in U3
TATA box, Sp1 sites, NF-ฮบB, etc. (virus-dependent)
Pol II assembles a normal eukaryotic pre-initiation complex
Transcription initiates at the U3/R junction
RNA includes:
R → U5 → viral genes → R → U5 (at the 3′ end)
That’s why the viral RNA has R sequences at both ends—they’re duplicated during reverse transcription.
4. Why this doesn’t violate promoter “rules”
Promoters being non-transcribed is a functional definition, not an absolute one.
What matters is:
Where transcription starts, not where polymerase binds
Many cellular promoters actually produce:
Very short upstream transcripts
Bidirectional or unstable RNAs
Promoter-proximal RNAs
LTRs just make this architecture unusually explicit and compact.
5. Special twists in endogenous retroviruses (ERVs)
Since you’re interested in placental evolution and syncytins, this part matters ๐
When LTRs are co-opted by the host:
The U3 promoter can drive transcription of host genes
Sometimes transcription starts slightly upstream or downstream of the canonical viral TSS
LTRs can function as:
Alternative promoters
Tissue-specific enhancers
Bidirectional promoters
In placenta, LTRs often become actively transcribed regulatory units, not just passive promoters.
6. Short answer summary
✔️ You’re right: promoters are generally not transcribed
✔️ Retroviral LTRs contain promoter elements, but transcription usually starts just downstream of them
✔️ Only part of the LTR (R and U5) is transcribed
✔️ LTRs blur the promoter/transcript boundary but do not break the basic rule
If you want, I can:
Sketch a promoter/TSS map in text
Compare LTRs to cellular CpG-island promoters
Dive into how LTR transcription is regulated epigenetically in placenta
Just say the word.
I asked ChatGPT a follow-on question.
Thank you. I'm looking for evidence that LTRs must be of retroviral origin, transcription of the provirus being a necessary part of the retroviral replication cycle. What is distinctive about LTRs in comparison with other regulatory sequences?
This is an excellent, deep question, and you’re asking it in exactly the right way: not “what do LTRs do,” but what makes an LTR recognizably retroviral rather than just another eukaryotic regulatory module.
I’ll answer in three layers:
Why LTRs must arise from retroviral replication
What features distinguish LTRs from ordinary promoters/enhancers
What counts as evidence in practice (genomic, mechanistic, phylogenetic)
1. Why LTRs must be retroviral in origin
LTRs are not just promoters. Their defining property is that they are copied twice during reverse transcription and end up as direct repeats flanking an integrated provirus.
That structure arises only if:
RNA is copied into DNA by reverse transcriptase
the same terminal sequence is duplicated during strand transfers
integration inserts the sequence with LTRs on both sides
This duplication mechanism is mathematically inevitable in retroviral replication:
During reverse transcription
The RNA genome has:
5′ U5 — R — U3 3′
Reverse transcription uses template switching twice, which results in:
5′ U3 — R — U5 viral genes U3 — R — U5 3′
This precise duplication pattern is not produced by any known cellular DNA replication or recombination mechanism.
No cellular transposon or promoter evolution pathway produces:
two identical regulatory regions at both ends
with the U3/R/U5 tripartite structure
produced by RNA template jumping
So the existence of paired LTRs with these internal subdivisions is itself evidence of retroviral ancestry.
2. What makes LTRs distinctive compared to normal regulatory sequences
LTRs are unusual because they are simultaneously:
In other words:
LTRs are multifunctional replication devices, not just regulatory modules.
Key structural features that are highly diagnostic
A. U3–R–U5 architecture
This is not seen in host promoters.
Each subregion has a defined replication role:
U3 = transcriptional control region
R = repeated RNA sequence for template switching
U5 = reverse transcription priming region
The presence of these three blocks, even in degraded form, is a major hallmark.
B. Identical flanking repeats
Host regulatory sequences are not duplicated symmetrically around coding regions.
LTRs appear as:
LTR — gag — pol — env — LTR
Even after gene loss, endogenous retroviruses remain bracketed by:
LTR — degenerate sequence — LTR
This paired structure is extremely unlikely to evolve convergently.
C. Integration target site duplications (TSDs)
Retroviral integrase creates short duplications of host DNA at insertion sites.
So LTRs are often flanked by:
host DNA — TSD — LTR — viral DNA — LTR — TSD — host DNA
This is a molecular scar unique to integrase-mediated insertion.
D. Primer binding site (PBS) and polypurine tract (PPT)
Even degraded LTR elements retain traces of:
PBS complementary to a host tRNA
PPT used to prime plus-strand DNA synthesis
These motifs are not found in normal promoters.
E. Directional transcription + poly(A) signal coupling
LTRs uniquely combine:
promoter in U3
transcription start at U3/R
polyadenylation signal in R/U5
In cellular genes, promoter and poly(A) signals are far apart.
In LTRs, they are compact and mechanistically linked.
3. Evidence from evolutionary behavior
LTRs do things no ordinary regulatory sequence does:
A. Solo LTR formation
Homologous recombination between the two LTRs deletes the internal viral genes, leaving a solo LTR.
This is seen genome-wide in mammals.
This process depends on:
the LTRs being nearly identical
recombination machinery recognizing them
No host promoter family shows this characteristic deletion pattern.
B. Phylogenetic nesting with retroviruses
LTR sequences form trees that:
cluster with known retroviruses
preserve gag/pol/env gene remnants nearby
show orthologous insertions across species
This is extremely strong evidence of common ancestry.
For example:
syncytin LTRs cluster with specific ERV families
same LTR found at same genomic locus in related mammals
C. Transcription requirement for replication
You specifically asked:
transcription of the provirus being a necessary part of the retroviral replication cycle
Yes. Without host Pol II transcription of the 5′ LTR:
no genomic RNA
no mRNA for gag/pol/env
no progeny virions
So the LTR is under dual selection:
must recruit host transcription machinery
must satisfy reverse transcription constraints
This dual constraint is unique.
No cellular promoter is forced to function in both:
nuclear transcription
cytoplasmic reverse transcription architecture
4. Why LTRs are not just "ordinary regulatory sequences that got duplicated"
To argue that, one would need a non-retroviral mechanism that can produce:
paired identical regulatory regions
U3/R/U5 segmentation
tRNA primer binding site
polypurine tract
integrase footprints
solo-LTR recombination scars
phylogenetic continuity with viruses
There is currently no known cellular process that generates this entire signature set.
That’s why LTRs are considered among the strongest molecular fossils in genomes.
Stronger even than:
transposons
segmental duplications
gene families
5. The subtle point: LTRs do become normal regulatory elements later
Once domesticated, an LTR can behave indistinguishably from a host promoter/enhancer.
But that is a secondary exaptation.
The origin is recognizable because:
LTRs contain replication logic that no cellular regulatory sequence requires.
6. Why this matters for placental biology (your interest)
Placental syncytins are a perfect case:
envelope gene domesticated
LTR drives trophoblast-specific expression
but the LTR still bears:
retroviral transcription factor architecture
methylation sensitivity
solo-LTR relatives nearby
So the placenta is using a repurposed viral transcriptional machine, not a native promoter.
7. One-sentence answer
LTRs are distinctive because they are not merely promoters: they are replication-boundary devices whose structure, duplication, and genomic scars can only be produced by retroviral reverse transcription and integration.
If you want, I can go even deeper
Possible directions:
whether any non-retroviral elements mimic LTRs (hint: some LTR retrotransposons do, but they are retroviral descendants)
molecular clock evidence for LTR insertion waves
how confidently we can identify ancient LTRs that have degraded beyond obvious recognition
whether any known cellular process could theoretically evolve an LTR-like architecture de novo
Your question is already at a publishable-level nuance.
๐ Textbook / Review-Level References on Retroviral LTRs and Replication
1. LTR Structure and Origin in Retroviral Replication
These are standard references describing how LTRs arise from reverse transcription and how their subregions relate to retroviral replication:
Genetic Organization – Retroviruses (NCBI Bookshelf) — LTRs flanking retroviral genomes consist of three subregions (U3, R, U5), and this tripartite structure arises from template jumps during reverse transcription. U3 usually harbors promoter/enhancer elements, and R/U5 contain sequences linked to transcription start and polyadenylation. (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Transcription – Retroviruses (NCBI Bookshelf) — Retroviral transcription of integrated provirus is mediated by host RNA polymerase II, and the structure of the LTR directs transcription initiation at the U3/R junction and processing at the R/U5 boundary. (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Principles of Retroviral Vector Design – Retroviruses (NCBI Bookshelf) — Overview of essential cis-acting sequences in retroviral vectors, including how LTRs contain promoter, polyadenylation, PBS, PPT, and direct repeat elements necessary for propagation. (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
๐งฌ Primary Literature on LTRs as Retroviral Signatures
2. Linking LTRs to Retroviral Insertions
These sources help support the argument that LTRs are signatures of retroviral insertions rather than random regulatory sequences:
Endogenous retrovirus — general overview (Wikipedia) — LTRs occur at both ends of retroviral or retrotransposon elements, and their duplication is a hallmark of retroviral integration. (Wikipedia)
Variation in proviral content among human genomes mediated by LTR recombination (Mobile DNA) — Most human ERVs descend from retroviral families and are flanked by paired LTRs; solo LTRs arise by recombination between those flanks after insertion. (SpringerLink)
Nomenclature for endogenous retrovirus (ERV) loci — Describes LTR structural regions (U3, R, U5) and how recombination between them produces solo LTRs, a molecular signature of retroviral integration. (SpringerLink)
๐ฌ Functional and Regulatory Roles of LTRs in Genomes
3. LTRs as Regulatory Sequences
These references document how LTRs can act as promoters/enhancers when endogenized, distinguishing them from many normal cellular regulatory elements:
Endogenous retroviral solo-LTRs in human genome (PubMed review) — Solo LTRs can supply promoters/enhancers for host gene expression, illustrating how retroviral regulatory modules are co-opted in genomes. (PubMed)
Systematic identification and characterization of regulatory elements derived from LTRs — LTRs are enriched for transcription factor binding sites and occupy open chromatin regions, providing regulatory sequences co-opted by the host. (PLOS)
Endogenous retrovirus — regulatory examples (Wikipedia) — LTRs of ancient retroviral insertions have been shown to act as promoters for human genes (e.g., AMY1C, BAAT). (Wikipedia)
๐ง Mechanistic Evidence of Retroviral Functions
4. Retroviral Replication and Cis-Acting Elements
These articles provide experimental detail on critical motifs tied to retroviral replication inside cells:
Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms… (FEMS Microbiology Reviews / PMC) — Discussion of reverse transcription including how U3, U5, PBS and polypurine tract sequences are all part of retroviral replication logic that yields LTRs. (OUP Academic)
Retroviral PBS-segment sequence and structure — PBS sequence immediately downstream of U5 is universally required in retroviruses to prime reverse transcription. (SpringerLink)
These elements (PBS, PPT) and their mechanistic roles are conserved across retroviruses, not found in standard host regulatory elements, supporting the idea that LTRs derive from retroviral processes and not ordinary genomic evolution.
๐งช Evolutionary Evidence
5. Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Context
These references discuss how LTR retroelements and ERVs behave in genomes:
Adaptive expansion of ERVK solo-LTRs — Solo LTRs from endogenous retroviral families accumulate across species, showing retroviral signatures and roles in regulation. (Nature)
The Evolution of Endogenous Viral Elements (Cell Host & Microbe review) — A high-level overview of how endogenous retroviruses (and their LTRs) reflect ancient retroviral insertions, with LTR sequence characteristics serving as evolutionary markers. (cell.com)
๐ Additional Useful Reviews and Overviews
If you want to dig deeper into broader topics like how LTR retrotransposons relate to retroviruses or how endogenous retroviral elements influence host regulation:
LTR Retrotransposon (Wikipedia) — Overview of LTR-retrotransposons vs. retroviruses and how both share the reverse transcription mechanism. (Wikipedia)
Transposable element (Wikipedia) — Classification of retrotransposons including LTR elements, showing broader context of reverse-transcribed mobile elements. (Wikipedia)
No comments:
Post a Comment